Sunday, August 23, 2009

2009 Caterham 7


There’s a big difference between myself and Lotus founder Colin Chapman. When I change a flat tire, I find that I have two lug nuts left over. Chapman could create fully functioning sports/racing cars out of the detritus found in the average kitchen junk drawer. One-handed. While sipping tea. The Lotus Seven—later Super 7—is perhaps the best-known and longest-lasting example of his Frankensteinian genius. Debuting in 1957 and running on to 1973 (when Caterham Cars grabbed the baton), the 7 has undergone decades of continuous development yet is essentially the same vehicle that Chapman created. And none the worse for it.
The Caterham 7 is no more styled than a shoe tree. The 7’s tubular space frame is barely spacious enough to affix a De Dion rear suspension with Watts linkage, cradle an engine of your choice, and hold a couple of legless stools upon which drivers are expected to sit. It’s wrapped tight with sheet aluminum and adorned with just enough fiberglass to drape the tires and radiator. A child’s first-grade crayon drawing is more likely to wind up at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The car’s real beauty: the non-inclusion of anything that could come between the driver and the road.
The modern Caterham 7 Classic possesses a healthy amount of Chapman’s most cherished auto-mechanical quality: less. Which, of course leads to lightness. At 525 kg (1157.42 lb.), the entry-level Caterham 7 Classic could be hung from a branch on a Christmas tree. Powered by a garden-variety 1.4-litre K-Series engine making all of 105 hp @ 6000 rpm, the most basic of 7s works the neck muscles and adrenal glands plenty. In this guise, we’re torquing 95 lb·ft of twist @ 5000 rpm; 200 bhp-per-tonne; and a zero to sixty sprint of 6.5 seconds.
On the subject of powertrains, there has never been a specific, standard engine for the car. The products of Dearborn have often been Caterham factory favorites, providing a nice squint-and-you-can-almost-see-it link back to Jim Clark’s Lotus/Ford Indy 500 winner. The top-of-the-range CSR200 sports a 200 hp 2.3-litre Cosworth Duratec that will propel the Caterham 7 from nought to sixty in 3.7 seconds.
Due to stern international emissions and safety regulations, the Seven retains its origins as a some-assembly-required box of bits. So it’s left up to the individual re-animator to decide how he or she wants to go about the business of providing propulsion. Caterham 7 spotters will tell you (and tell you and tell you) that it’s not uncommon to find Buick V-8s, Mazda rotaries, motorcycle lumps, or ATWF (anything that will fit) when peeking under the slatted engine lid. No doubt someone somewhere has given steam a go.
The 7’s existence proves that someone automotively-aware coined the term bucket list. For one thing, installing a round driver in the peg-shaped car requires maximum commitment; you can sit down any time you like but you can never leave. At least not easily. The process is and best managed without the “doors” and “roof” that the smirking lads at Caterham call weather “protection.” When in motion, the fabric serves about as much of a purpose as foil-wrapped Trojans, only without even the promise of protection.
Remarkably, approached on even terms, the Dartford dart is not entirely uncomfortable. Sticking with the sexual metaphor (so to speak), the cockpit will never inspire thoughts of paradise-by-the-dashboard-light heir creation. At 6′, 200 lb, and a size 10E foot, I fit just fine, chiropractically speaking.
Once on the move, two thoughts immediately occur: 1) in terms of dynamics, every other road car you’ve driven sucks, and 2) sucks is too delicate a word for the discrepancy between the 7 and non-7s. To state the bleeding obvious, the Seven is a track car first, a road car if you dare. Either way, the Caterham’s non-assisted steering and ventilated front discs (with four pot calipers) transmit every step of their mechanical operation, transforming its driver into a 7borg. The gearbox—here a Ford Sierra 5-speed with a lever no longer than your thumb—rewards with a pleasure that would cheer Lewis Black.
Wind turbulence, even at modest speed, brings to mind skydiving sideways. Communication, should a passenger be brave enough to accompany you, is best left for rest stops or emergency miming, even considering a relative physical proximity usually shared only by newlyweds.
Perhaps the great delight of the Seven is that it’s a rolling polygraph machine. It puts the lie to so much of conventional auto wisdom: a righteous ride requires big power, fat tires, and the latest electronic whiz-bangeroo. True, the Caterham offers variants stuffed with an assortment of wallet-lightening upgrades, add-ons, and gotta-haves. Hey, it’s a living. But just because a menu lists fifteen desserts doesn’t mean your meal should include them all.
No, the Caterham Seven, like its Lotus Seven forebear, is the distillation of what is only necessary for a drive. What it means to drive. That it somewhat resembles a coffin such as the one that currently holds the bones of a certain Mr. Chapman is just one of life’s lovely little ironies.

The last four years were rough sailing for Buick’s flagship having traded its swank Park Avenue home for an understated Swiss bungalow. While its Enclave sibling received a halfhearted Presidential endorsement, Lucerne has been told gently that it has no place in Buick’s future. But you don’t need to be Jim Dollinger to see the silver lining in the Lucerne Super: it stands in sharp contrast to Buick’s confusing dalliances with European chassis and a variety of puny powertrains. Perhaps the 2009 Lucerne Super is more than a Buick. It’s the last stand for what was right with the brand.
The Super is no slouch in the sheetmetal department, considering the Lucerne’s basic goodness has aged well. A redesigned front with a lower, meaner chevron-shaped grille walks the fine line between obnoxious Americana and contemporary Euro-flair. The fast C-pillar with a tastefully understated tail looks good enough to find their way on the Chevy Malibu. And while “Super” specific badging, unique 18″ wheels and distinctive portholes round out the package, the Lucerne does what we expect from Buicks: play second fiddle to Cadillac. And does it with gusto.
But wait a moment: this flagship’s interior has an inferiority complex in this price point or next to a Chevy Malibu. The dashboard’s lower hemisphere is work-truck grade rubbish, further punished by its uncanny resemblance to same part in the Chevy Impala. The Lucerne Super gets a “dash” of faux-aluminum paint around the impressive Harmon Kardon-tuned stereo, but the real upgrades come from a dash top stitched with leather-like trimmings and blessed with Alcantara-ish accents on the seats and doors. Too bad the Super’s extra touches couldn’t dress up that tasteless console and thrift store roll-top door: it’s a sad state of affairs when a Hyundai (Genesis) absolutely tramples a Buick in the luxury and refinement department.
That’s not to say that all is lost, the Lucerne Super has excellent seating for five, gadgets aplenty and a rich wood-rimmed wheel that feels substantial to the touch. Did I mention gadgets? XM Nav traffic, OnStar turn-by-turn guidance, Bluetooth, MP3 adaptability, heated/cooled seats and a heated steering wheel are the textbook definition of pure luxury ingredients for the near-luxury market.
If the Lucerne Super sounds like a compromised but obscurely appealing package from a brand normally associated with pure vanilla nothingness, you’re ready to take the Super for a spin. Buick took the outgoing Lucerne CXS’ dynamic shortcomings and did their best to make a less corner-averse package. Considering the curious starting point of a 4000 lb platform driving the wrong set of wheels though, the challenge is obvious.
The Super starts things off right with 17 more Northstar-bred horses in play. The Lucerne Super’s beautifully vulgar V8 has a hair-raising tenor, pulling harder to redline than the outgoing CXS, even with the four-speed slush box losing mucho revs between shifts. Maybe it’s the loss of 7 lb·ft of torque, but the Last of the Great V8 Buicks feels less likely to torque steer in all but the hardest maneuvers. Fuel mileage and horsepower figures be damned, the Northstar V8 cannot be replaced by GM’s “high-content” 3.6L six pot. Sonically speaking, it’s simply that rewarding at full throttle.
But things get serious when the road takes a turn for the better. And the Lucerne Super handles it with surprising authority: revised springs, a thicker front anti-sway bar and communicative steering rack (with more on-center feel) mate with Delphi’s absolutely sublime Magnaride system for a composed and borderline entertaining corner carver at less than Baruthian speeds. Push harder and there’s an oxcart full of front plow, with little body roll thanks to Magnaride’s magnetic magic.
Braking on such a compliant suspension means there’s more heart attack inducing dive in a panic stop: a genuine concern given the Lucerne’s demographic. Buick’s lane departure and blind spot warning systems keep Octogenarians cool and calm, but their annoyance level makes both gadgets useless outside the realm of pure Interstate travel.
So the Lucerne Super isn’t a credible threat to foreign competitors, but the geeky and ferocious behavior only paints a rich tapestry about this muscular Buick’s persona. The ride is stellar and amazingly quiet at part throttle, easily unseating a comparable Lexus ES: Quiet Tuning über alles, baby.
But what fails the Lucerne Super is the base model: pushrod-V6 Lucernes with even worse interior bits make sure the $45,000 Super is a tough sell. And the Super still straddles the uncomfortable ground between land yacht and sports tourer, but that gray area is now more rewarding.
Too bad the rethought, reincarnated Super cannot overcome the inertia of GM’s incompetence: shameful considering this brand once stood for building “Premium American Motorcars.” Hopefully Buick survives world-car synergies long enough to make a proper Lucerne replacement. If not, here’s a tribute to better days even if they weren’t that great to start.


The giant panda has been largely unchanged for millions of years. Evolution made some nips and tucks, but mostly let the species be. Perhaps because the design is right. Strong, capable, cute as . . . well . . . as a Mini Cooper, also largely unchanged since last we looked. So, is no news good news or has the Mini been left behind?
My Mini was Toy Fire Truck red. They call it something else in the brochure and they’re wrong. The rolling curves, contrasting tones, Bambi eyes and Cheshire Cat smile make you not so much want to drive this car as play with it.
The inside amps up that feeling: Radar screen gauges, rocker switches sourced from a Spitfire—you feel like you’re in Thunder Bird 6. All of the controls move smoothly. Most are supple plastic with only a hint of cheapness in the hard-to-reach places. It’s not intuitive, or even logical sometimes—window lifts sit where ashtrays used to hang. Love it or hate it, the interior is distinctive.
It is also practical. Two ‘growns’ fit just fine up front. Two half-growns fit OK in back. Seats up gives you 5.7 sq. feet of cargo space—less than a sidecar. Seats down and you’ve got 24 sq. feet behind a wide hatch. The aquarium design results in visibility bested only by a convertible. As goofy as the whole design seems, it’s not sacrificing utility.
The car is actually not big on sacrifice. 28, 37, 32 are great measurements . . . for mileage (city, highway, combo). That’s what you get with 118 horsepower. Just when you think you’re giving up fun for the sake of fuel savings, the real charm of the Mini shows.
The dual layshaft Getrag six-speed (a four speed with two output shafts) and snappy clutch let you juice the motor as much as you like. The throws are short, so you can keep the little engine in the biggest part of its power-band. The whole drivetrain has a puppy-waiting-by-the-door attitude.
The electronic steering lets you maximize the engine output. It tightens up nicely at speed and relaxes to park. It’s also one of the elements affected by the Sport button on the shifter boot. Pressing it warns the various on-board computers that mileage is not your primary concern. The steering firms up more quickly and the throttle response hastens. As these things happen anyway after the Mini’s processors have judged you, the button is more affectation than innovation. Still, pushing it helps warn your passengers, too.
Which they will thank you for once you start tossing this thing around. Yes, the car is style-conscious and gitchy [Ed. kitschy?]. The chassis, suspension and brakes give the style substance. The Mini is a fully flauntable sports car, even in base form. The normally aspirated engine doesn’t have the punch of the S model’s power-plant. That also means you can drive flat out loony and never get into trouble. Mini Legal would never let Mini Marketing say this, but I can: Minis can’t be rolled. You will never tip, spin or punch this car beyond your control. Go on. Try.
In whipping your Mini the worst that will happen is tire wear. And that’s great. The sooner you slip out of the run-flats and into something less comfortable the better. I have no complaints with the grip of the stock all seasons; it’s that they so efficiently convert comfort into noise.
Which can be mitigated by any number of the 7.2 million options available for the vehicle. The car is customizable from the dealer in ways previously found only in the truck center. Mine had Bluetooth phone integration and an iPod dock, allowing me to control the MP3 player from the stereo or, even better, right from the steering wheel, correcting the tire noise.
The way most of us use our cars most of the time the Mini is superb. No bragging rights. No smoked Trans Ams at the stoplight. Certainly no crossing the Rubicon. It’s nimble, athletic and supports your life, rather than add a new burden. That’s probably one of the best things you can say about any purchase.
It’s also, I believe, the way the car buying public is headed. As we wake up from the current recession and feel the pressure of pent-up demand, I think an increasing number of consumers are going to be looking a car that does more with less. There will always be a market for a bike ramp with 500 pound feet of torque or a gentleman’s club on 19″ rims. The trend, for the meat of the market, will bend towards usable fun. It already shows in the steadily growing list of Mini competitors. None of which are putting it on the endangered species list

2009 Jaguar XF




Last month, U.S. Jag dealers sold just over a thousand new cars, despite cut-rate financing. While the entire U.S. car market is going South, Jaguar's stuffy image is sending the venerable marque Hades-wise in a supersonic hand basket. The new XF midrange sedan is supposed to reverse these declining fortunes by burying memories of the bulbous, fusty, pudenda-fronted S-Type (not to mention the execrable X-Type). I grabbed an XF fresh off the transporter to see if Jag’s lobbing snowballs in Hell.
Let’s get this out of the way: the new XF’s design is a pale shadow of the C-XF concept’s drop dead gorgeous sheetmetal. We’re talking supermodel versus neighborhood bartender. The XF’s front end is a particularly boring transmogrification; it's a little weird and the snout’s portal smacks of Volvo’s blandest. The central bonnet creases are a particularly classless affectation. In fact, you could say the XF is nothing more than a Volvo in a slutty dress.
The back end almost saves the day; it looks like an Aston Martin. It's fantastic. But Ian Callum gets no props for designing the same car over (DB9) and over (V8 Vantage) and over (Jag XK coupe) and over (XF sedan). If Jaguar was going to show a scintilla of individuality, well, they could have hidden the door handles in the B- and C-pillars.
As for the XF’s interior, we've all seen the boring press pictures included here. The company’s PR photographer should be fired for not doing justice to this four-wheeled shrine to automotive luxury.
The XF’s interior’s fit, finish and materials are the best I’ve ever seen in a production car, without exception. If you're the type of person that appreciates exquisite detailing of a fine watch, you can do nothing but marvel at the XF’s cabin. The wood trim in my optionless "Luxury" trim model could have been fashioned by a bespoke furniture maker. The matte finish is both unique and stunning.
The XF’s attention to detail dusts the usual standard bearer Audi. The vents rotate into view when you start the car up (royalty payment to Volkswagen’s ill-fated Phaeton?). They boast aluminum inserts to move their direction, with the word "Jaguar" elegantly stamped on their surface. We're talking about slivers of material the size of long grain rice. The same beautifully finished metal sits at the bottom of the cupholders. Every surface is sensuous to the touch. For once, a Jag/Ford product feels… finished.
Okay, so the exterior is lame, the interior is otherworldly. How does it drive? In a word: Yes. Yes as in the new XF drives as well as you'd hope any Jaguar would.
Jaguar wanted to build a luxury-sports car in keeping with its distinguished brand heritage– a tradition of which Larry the Law Firm Partner neither knows nor cares. What Larry does care about: beating the crap out of Bob’s Benz E350. And with this car, Larry’s good to go.
Jag’s 4.2 liter V8– a carry-over from the last generation S-Type– is the XF’s standard-fit powerplant. “But it only makes 300 horsepower! Lots of V6 engines do that!" Quit your bitching brand defilers, lest you taste the business end of my tassled loafers pushing you into an Acura RL. Even with "only" 300 horsepower underfoot, the entry-level XF accelerates from zero to sixty miles per hour in about six seconds. Besides, the Jaguar XF driving experience is fleet footed. The six speed auto is slicker than snot on a doorknob. The suspension feels buttoned down, with just enough feedback to keep it fun without being abusive.
There are downsides. While the XF is light on its toes, changing direction with confidence-inspiring predictability and hoon-compatible ease, it doesn’t have everlasting grip. Canst thou squeal like a porcine? The XF’s tires can. And the sport sedan’s steering is far too light for a car with genuine performance aspirations. But overall, driving the XF is like piloting a BMW without the e-Nanny hovering over your shoulder.
So much of this car is so right - the interior, the suspension, the engine and the transmission. Killer depreciation aside, the $50k asking price for a fully loaded V8 XF makes a mockery of the similarly-priced, stripped-out 535i. Unlike the Bimmer, Lexus or Audi equivalents, driving the XF makes you feel special.
It’s too bad that the mid-size Jag’s exterior went from a quaint retro curiosity to an OMG concept car to a quintessentially boring sedan. If Jag had found a way to keep the CX-F’s drama, they would have had a huge hit on their hands. As it stands now, all they have is a bit of time to kill before Ford sells Jaguar or, let’s face it, pulls the plug. Even as a swan song, the XF lacks the looks it needs to fly.

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

2010 Nissan Sentra


You know that pubescent second cousin with the thick glasses and the scrawny arms who quizzes you at family reunions with the latest automotive minutiae? Potential questions for this year concern the 2010 Nissan Sentra, so pay attention. (Or don’t, and ignore the kid and head back for more KFC and macaroni salad.)
All six available Sentra trim levels get new head- and taillights and new interior fabrics, while the three with no sporting pretensions—those would be the base 2.0, 2.0 S, and 2.0 SL—get new grilles and fascias to boot. New fog-light covers appear on the 2.0 and 2.0 S, but the 2.0 SL keeps its old fog lights.
The SL trim gets most of the attention. The previously included leather seats are broken out into a standalone option package, dropping the price $1100—and re-adding leather costs only $700. Additional standard equipment includes an audio head unit with a 4.3-inch display, traction and stability control, a new 16-inch aluminum wheel design, and an optional navigation system that won’t be available until January 2010.
SL models also get chrome body-side and trunk trim shared with the S trim level, which also gets new 16-inch wheel covers, and all trim levels except the most base 2.0 get new iPod integration standard.
The 2010 Sentra is on sale now, with base prices ranging from $17,320 to $20,800 including delivery. Now you know the details. But maybe you should still pretend you don’t. That poor kid doesn’t have much going for him.

2010 Hyundai Tucson - Auto Shows


Hyundai’s stand at the Frankfurt auto show in September will feature a funky redesign of the Tucson SUV.
To be called the ix35 in Europe, the updated Tucson is the product of Hyundai’s new design center in Germany. The company says the curvy body lines reflect the “fluidic sculpture” design language that we first saw in the Ix-onic concept at the Geneva auto show—in fact, the new Tucson is almost an exact copy of the Ix-onic. The result is a futuristic shape with fresh lines that’s far more exciting than the staid Tucson currently prowling the world’s roads.
It’s probably about time for an updated Tucson, as the current model remains essentially unchanged since its 2004 debut. The last time we drove a Tucson, in February 2008, it finished eighth in a nine-SUV comparison test. The car felt dated and seemed to be geared toward more, ahem, dated drivers. Current U.S.-market drivetrains on our shores are a 2.0-liter inline-four and an available 2.7-liter V-6; all-wheel drive is optional. The new model will offer all-wheel drive and diesel engine choices, the latter likely only for Europe.
European and Korean versions of the SUV will launch within the next six months. The U.S. will also get its new Tucson in the next year, but we’ll have to wait a while for specifics.

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Mercedes reveals details of new E-class estate






Mercedes has offered a sneak preview of its new E-class estate, due to be officially unveiled at the Frankfurt show in September.
Get superb car deals delivered free each week

New E-class estate has same curvy bodywork as the saloon
The new Mercedes-Benz E-class estate is big – boasting a maximum of 1,950 litres of luggage space, it easily outstrips premium brand rivals.
Despite the exaggerated angle to the rear roofline and the more curvaceous new E-class bodywork, the maximum load-lugging capacity for the new Mercedes E-class estate is 40 litres more than the model it replaces.
That’s also considerably better than class rivals, such as the
Audi A6 Avant and BMW 5 Series Touring, which can muster only 1,660- and 1,650-litres, respectively.



Merc estate should have class-leading boot space



However, that is with the rear seats folded flat - an operation easily completed via a pair of levers in the boot. Mercedes is yet to confirm how much space you get with the rear seats in place, but we can confidently suggest it will be close to or better than the class-leading 690 litres of the current E-class estate.

In case the massive boot isn't big enough, there's another storage compartment under the floor
Supplementing the wardrobe-swallowing space, Mercedes has thought to include an automatic opening and closing tailgate as standard, and a folding load compartment floor.
These, and the multi-position load cover, come under a new ‘Easy-Pack’ description for the car’s practicality features.
The new E-class estate is also the only car in its class to be offered with an optional folding bench seat in the boot.


Safety and comfort a priority for E-class


Self-levelling rear suspension ensures that whatever you’re carrying the vehicle’s handling will remain in balance.
This works in partnership with adaptive damping carried over from the
E-class saloon to ensure safety and comfort at all times - though the estate does feature slightly stiffer suspension, compensating for the extra weight of its additional bodywork.
Furthermore, The E-class estate is available with all of the E-class saloon’s cutting-edge
safety kit. This includes nine airbags and Mercedes’ ‘attention assist’ system as standard.
The latter monitors the driver for signs of drowsiness, and issues an alert if it believes they are about to fall asleep.
Passenger comfort should also be better than the existing E-class estate, too, thanks to greater width and headroom in the rear.


Eco diesels lead E-class engine range


Engine choices for the new car include Mercedes’ efficient new 2.2-litre turbodiesel, which returns 48.7mpg and emits 150g/km CO2. This is available with either 167bhp or 201bhp.
In fact, the diesel options are so impressive it’s almost not worth bothering to mention the petrol alternatives. But rest assured four-cylinder, V6 and V8 petrol E-class estates will be available - topped off by an E 63 AMG performance version, available shortly after the initial launch.
UK pricing and specification details for the new Mercedes-Benz E-class estate are yet to be announced. The estate makes its public debut at the
Frankfurt motor show in September, before arriving in dealerships in early 2010.

Saturday, July 4, 2009

BMW


bmw z4 concept sports car as seen at the 2006 detroit auto show. isolated on a white background. more car photos available in my gallery.

There was a time when the car market was simple. You could buy small cars, medium-sized cars and big cars. Then came MPVs, SUVs and models that were smaller than small, such as the Smart, or bigger than big, like the Maybach.
These days, the choices are so diverse that no manufacturer knows quite where to innovate next. As more and more niches appear, it's getting harder to produce genuinely original ideas. SEAT is the latest maker to try to create a unique opening in the market with the new Toledo. It's unlike its utterly conventional predecessor, and doesn't fall into any cut-and-dried category.
The newcomer looks similar to the Altea MSV (Multi Sports Vehicle), featuring SEAT's fresh family nose and having a similar high-sided appearance. But the Toledo is larger - as long and as wide as a Ford Mondeo.
It's neither a hatchback nor an estate. The rear window wraps round to meet the reverse-raked C-pillar, while the flat bootlid lifts up with the glass to give a truly huge load area. The boot itself measures 500 litres with the rear seats up, while beneath the floor is a separate 91-litre hidden compartment, which is large enough to store three decent-sized shopping bags.
It's similarly spacious inside, with a well laid out cabin and a firm, supportive driving position. We found that the steering column didn't quite provide a comfortable position for us - although it's adjustable for both rake and reach, we were always too close to the wheel, even with it set as far away as possible.
Accommodation in the rear is excellent, with good legroom and ample seating for three adults, while the high roofline gives great headroom all-round.
We drove the 2.0-litre TDI, which will be the flagship Toledo when it goes on sale next year. Its 140bhp VW-sourced engine is crisp and responsive, as well as frugal and refined, and can be mated to a choice of six-speed manual or DSG clutchless manual transmissions.
Performance is impressive, with the 0-60mph sprint completed in a shade under 10 seconds and a 124mph top speed. But it's the in-gear acceleration that really grabs your attention. Hit the throttle on the way out of a corner and power is always instantly available, even from low down in the rev range.
The handling is tidy, if not exciting, with a comfortable ride and good body control. Our main criticism concerns the steering, which feels lifeless and offers little in the way of driver involvement.
So the only question is where the new Toledo falls in the marketplace. It's a tough one to answer, and even SEAT seems unsure. The car tries to combine the virtues of a family hatchback, an estate and an MPV, and goes some way to succeeding. The combination of all three styles has resulted in a few compromises, and there are better hatches, estates and MPVs on the market - yet few cars are as good at multi-tasking

uly 18, 2007—A humpback whale with a tongue swollen to the size of a small car has been found on the rocky shores of Admiralty Island in southeast Alaska (see Alaska map).Scientists believe that a collision forced air into the male humpback's tongue and caused it to swell. A ship could be responsible for the death of the 40-foot (12-meter) whale, which was found last week."It is certainly possible that it was a ship strike, but that's still inconclusive," Aleria Jensen, a scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Alaska, told the Associated Press.There have been about 60 collisions between ships and large whales in Alaska since the 1970s. But the humpback population, which is currently estimated at 10,000, is growing at an annual rate of 7 percent. As the whale population grows, collisions will become more common, researchers believe.Scientists performed a necropsy Friday and plan to analyze samples of the animal's skin, blubber, stomach contents, and various other tissues. The study could take several weeks to complete, Jensen said."There's never any guarantee that we can find the cause of death, but that's always our goal," she said.—Cori Sue MorrisPhotograph from AP/NOAA Fisheries Service

Whenever I see the Elise, I keep thinking how much it looks like my MR2, but even sexier.. Anyone have pictures of an Elise next to a MKII MR2? How much lower is it really?Many parking lots swallow up my present car, I occasionally have trouble finding it because it is so low. Would I need one of those fluorescent flags on a pole or tie a balloon to it?Hey, you joke, but it helps! I have one of those wal-mart smiley face antenna balls on my CB whip for my jeep. (and yes, it's the one with the cowboy hat. What can I say, I'm from TX) I never have a problem finding the jeep, even if I'm parked behind a conversion van.This thread has a few good pictures.http://www.elisetalk.com/forums/show...&threadid=1269-Eric__________________'05 Lotus Elise on orderArdent, Touring/Black, Hardtop, 3M

The Range Rover MK1, 4 wheel drive off road capable car. This 1970 design has made itself an institution around the world, combining luxury travel with off road driving ability to almost match the LandRover,

LandRover Defender 4 wheel drive vehicle. This is the 4 wheel drive to beat all others. Available in three wheelbases the vehicle is used the world over by farmers, military units, builders and anyone else who requires a dependable offroad work-horse.The modern examples of this vehicle are superb pieces of engineering.

The Audi R- Zero concept is the work of a transport designer and two digital designers from the International Design School, France.Franck Levivier, Rémi Marchand and Pierre-Olivier Wagner's collaboration centered around a desire to create a concept supercar for a time when the world could no longer rely on oil for a source of power.Essential to the R-Zero's design was a belief that despite the cars environmentally friendly credentials it should have the ability to excite.A projected 1091 horsepower comes from four individual in-wheel electric motors powered by a row of batteries positioned just forward of the rear axle.One of the advantages of the electric drivetrain layout is that it has allowed the R-Zero's designers to capitalise on the cooling airflow provided by the front grille. Running the length of the Audi R-Zero is a hollow backbone frame which channels airflow in though the front grille, distributes cooling air to various temperature sensitive components - like the brakes, and then expels the air out the central rear grille.Despite its gorgeous lines and innovative engineering, the Audi R-Zero is only a concept. There are no plans to build a working one-off. Let alone put the vehicle into production.

Make BMWModel H2RConcept year 2005Production year -Engine 12 cylinder hydrogenBMW's hydrogen-fueled H2R set nine world records for cars powered by a hydrogen-fueled internal combustion engine.With a top speed of more than 185 mph, the H2R is not destined for mass production, but does help develop cleaner powerplants for production models.The gorgeous aerodynamic body of the H2R was styled at BMW Group DesignworksUSA’s Newbury Park, Calif. studi

Hatchbacks are big business in Europe -- not just for small cars, but for mid-size and full-size cars as well. Despite the fact that large hatchbacks generally don't do well in the States, BMW is going to give it that ol' Germanic try with the upcoming 5-series Gran Turismo. The 5-series Gran Turismo features a fastback roofline similar to the X6 SUV, with a trick tailgate opens two ways -- there's a full-length hatch as well as a smaller trunk opening. A removable partition blocks off a separate cargo bay, eliminating the road noise from which many hatchbacks suffer. The Gran Turismo will initially be offered in 550i guise, powered by BMW's 400 hp 4.4 liter twin-turbo V8 coupled to a new 8-speed automatic transmission. BMW claims a 0-60 time of 5.4 seconds. No word on a second engine, but I imagine the 306 horsepower twin-turbo six from the X6 can't be far behind... or perhaps the 265 hp diesel from the 335d.

The ideal car for your business- or Holiday trip. Price per Day with 600 km included. Mobile Navi-System available for an extra charge. We would be glad to also arrange custom-made packages to better suit your personal needs. Please contact us with your specific trip details, such as the dates and distance you plan to drive. Service in English is available upon request.


Top 3 Smart Buys

Rover 75
We found a… 2003 Rover 75 1.8T Club SE automatic 4dr saloon, 20,000 miles, £5,995
Best bits – cosseting ride quality, value for money luxury, Club middle of the range but well kitted out, SE adds alloys, front fogs
Worst bits – OAP image, 1.8 prone to head gasket failure, turbo is more reliable offering performance of 2.0 with better economy

Mazda6
We found a… 2006 Mazda6 2.0 MZR TS 5dr hatchback, 7,755 miles, £13,995
Best bits – latest version with enhanced interior quality, excellent reliability record, fun to drive, lots of safety features, holds value well
Worst bits – ride on the hard side but shouldn’t bother too many people, unexciting image, 1.8 is noisy


We found a… 2004 Peugeot 406 HDi 90 S 4dr saloon, 72,149 miles, £5,689
Best bits – even prettier face-lifted version, spec includes all the usual refinements such as alloys, climate control
Worst bits – 90bhp engine not as desirable as 110, high mileage for 2004 car but they do last very well if looked after
Used Peugeot 406s between £4,000 and £6,000

It’s not just a pickup truck. It’s a Ford F-150.MSRP:2156540910MPG:1521HighlightsBest-in-class Towing and PayloadTrailer Sway ControlExcellent Power and Fuel EconomyVisit Vehicle SiteBuild and PriceSearch InventoryLocate a DealerFind IncentivesGet a Price QuoteFord F-250/F-350/F-450 Ford Explorer Sport Trac * All prices are for base models without additional options and exclude taxes, title and license fees. Dealer determines actual price, which may vary. Product specifications may change at any time.** EPA estimated city/highway MPG, base model. Vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) over 8,500 pounds are exempt from EPA testing.//alert("sLangSwitched = "+sLangSwitched);');document.write(' Indicates page in Spanish.');document.write('');} else if(sLangSwitched =="en") {document.write('');document.write(' Indica página en inglés.');document.write('');}-->


click above for high-res gallery of the Alton F-650 XUV
We’ve seen some outrageous F-650-based vehicles like this before (the DeBerti for one), but for some reason, the Alton F-650 XUV jumped out at us at the Chicago Auto Show. Perhaps we were already focused on Ford’s Work Solutions trucks in the vicinity, but this insane beast just put our DSLRs on autopilot. The F-650-based XUV was built by Alton Manufacturing and carries a GVWR of 25,999 lbs. That makes the 660 ft-lbs of torque generated by its 7.2L Caterpillar engine seem paltry. Besides the big-rig-meets-Excursion bodywork, your nearly $200,000 expenditure for this XUV will get you hardwood floors, custom captains chairs, a 42-speaker sound system, two drop-down 16-inch TVs plus a 42-inch plasma, four computer workstations, plus a train horn. Oh, you’ll also get bragging rights for the biggest, baddest truck in 99% of the world’s neighborhoods.

Every single page from the Lamborghini Cars, the enthusiast site showing a high resolution photo features the following statement :
All information and images found on this site are copyright protected by their respective owners and are used for review purpose only, nothing found on this site may be reproduced in any form without prior consent from the actual owner. while the wallpaper section features a similar statement for each screen resolution listed :
All wallpapers found on this site have been created by Mark Smeyers unless stated otherwise, these are all copyright protected, reproduction in any form is not permitted without prior, written consent from Lamborghini Cars. If you want to use any material found on this site, you should first obtain the original copyright owner's permission, this copyright owner is mentioned in the caption of the photo, if no name is present it does not mean the photo isn't copyright protected, every single photo or piece of information is still copyright protected by US Federal and International law.You should note that these days the image files on most websites have been digitally watermarked and actually contain copyright information embedded into the file, they can be traced to any website on the internet if needed in a legal confrontation.When you do obtain the required, written permission, you should post a notice that proclaims that this specific photograph is used with the permission of the original copyright owner, and include a link to the original site where the photo was found if this is requested.Say you would like to use one or more photo's featured on the Lamborghini Cars website ... this is possible by following these simple conditions :
if you want to use any photo or wallpaper from the Lamborghini Cars webserver as your background image on your computer, please go ahead, this is why this collection has been created in the first place, also creating an archive on your personal computer is allowed, as long as you don't publish the files in any form, known or unknown.
Unfortunately we can only give a license to publish photo's that we hold the copyrights to, we can't speak for the other photographer's whose photo's are presented on the Lamborghini Cars site, you should contact them directly for their personal permission. We would however like to know where the photo's end up, so please contact us before using any of the photo's we own.
The website you want to use the photo on should be a non-commercial website, using any of the material found on the Lamborghini Cars website for commercial purposes is NOT allowed.
The photo or wallpaper has to be used 'as is', this means no cropping or altering in any way, when you use the image on your own website, it must remain exactly the way it is available on the Lamborghini Cars website.
You must include the original copyright owner, as mentioned in the caption of that specific photo on the Lamborghini Cars website, on your website, also include the name 'Lamborghini Cars' and the 'www.LamboCars.com' url in this caption as the origin of this specific photo.
If your site features a 'links' section, we would like you to include the Lamborghini Cars website banner on that page, please use the banner found on our Lamborghini links page.
It is NOT allowed to link directly to the Lamborghini Cars server !This means when you want to use a photo, wallpaper, screensaver or any other file from the Lamborghini Cars website, you must first download it and upload it to your own webserver after you've received the permission to do so. Linking is only allowed to the main page : http://www.LamboCars.com/, not to any of the individual pages or files, bandwidth is expensive and limited.
The entire HTML coding and graphical layout of the Lamborghini Cars website is fully copyrighted and may NOT be copied or reproduced in any way !Under these simple conditions it is allowed to use a reasonable number of photo's found on the Lamborghini Cars website, it is however NOT allowed to create a copy of the website on any other server or publish it in any other form, written or electronic.If you still have any further questions, please don't hesitate to contact us, or take a look at the official US copyright page found at :

original Camaro was introduced to the Baby Boomer generation, a large group of young, individualistic and mobile Americans that drove fundamental changes in the auto industry. The Camaro was personal, sporty and powerful - attributes that were typically found on more expensive, smaller and, often, foreign sports cars. The Camaro represented a real life-sized sporty car that was attainable for just about everyone. An almost endless list of optional features, colors and trim combinations ensured owners could tailor their Camaro to their exact taste.
As Boomers transitioned into larger vehicles to accommodate growing families, younger drivers embraced used Camaros as their first cars, and third- and fourth-generations of the Camaro continued to deliver affordable fun and performance to a new generation of enthusiasts. Indeed, hundreds of thousands of owners of all walks of life have found driving fun in a Camaro during the past 40 years.
The new Camaro concepts draw on their namesakes' heritage, but also the global, youthful influences of the 21st century. These influences are seen in the Camaro convertible concept's bold proportions, tailored wheel-to-body relationship and detailed interior - including the multi-dimensional instruments. It's a design that resonates with a generation of younger car buyers influenced by highly stylized "tuner" cars and import sports cars.
"Youthful buyers want a car that makes a statement in its design as much as its performance," said Brian Smith, exterior designer. "The new Camaro concepts bridge heritage with contemporary style, with a design that is simultaneously admired among import-influenced youth and traditional enthusiasts."
Along with style and performance, the timeless spirit of fun is woven into the new Camaro concepts.
"Camaro has always represented the American ethic that style and performance don't belong exclusively to the wealthy," said Smith. "Camaro has always been everybody's sports car, and these new concepts demonstrate its spirit is relevant for a new generation."
CHEVROLET CAMARO CONVERTIBLE CONCEPT SPECIFICATIONS
Vehicle type: two-door, four-passenger rear-wheel-drive convertible
Wheelbase (in / mm): 110.5 / 2806
Length (in / mm): 186.2 / 4730
Width (in / mm): 79.6 / 2022
Height (in / mm): 53 / 1344
Track (in / mm): 63.8 / 1620 front; 63.3 / 1607 rear
Powertrain: V-8 engine with manual transmission
Suspension: four-wheel independent: MacPherson strut front, multilink rear, progressive rate coil springs, gas-pressurized dampers
Brakes: four-wheel disc, 14-in rotors with four-piston calipers
Wheels: cast aluminum; 21-in front, 22-in rear
Tires: 275/30R21 front, 305/30R22 rear


£6,000 – £8000
It’s even easier to find some more “interesting” alternatives to the mainstream norm in this price bracket. The revised Passat offers image – but you’ll be looking at higher mileages if it’s a Volkswagen you fancy. The Avensis is also a very worthy car; with Toyota finally having cracked the “good looking” code it makes a fine executive express. Petrolheads should investigate the Accord Type-R – even if it’s mostly leggier examples in this budget - as Honda engineering insures the performance doesn’t come at the expense of reliability.But, since the mainstream offers the widest selection it’s worth pointing out the Mondeo’s excellent TDCi diesel engines are now well within reach. Vauxhall’s latest Vectra is a credible alternative, if not quite as entertaining to drive, while last of the line 406s remain a style conscious choice. The succeeding 407 is just starting to become available for this money, too. You’ll either love the looks or hate them
Used Honda Accords between £6,000 and £8,000
Used Peugeot 407 between £6,000 and £8,000
How to spot a clocked car


Cars to avoid…

Mitsubishi Lancer is cheap but way behind class leaders
Mitsubishi’s Lancer looks good value – 2005 registered 1.6, 10,000 miles and fully kitted out. The trouble is, unless it’s turbocharged and badged “EVO”, the Lancer isn’t a great car. In fact, it’s a good example, in terms of fit and finish, styling, and refinement, of why buying for quality rather than age just makes more sense.

Honda Accord
We found a… 2004 Honda Accord 2.2 i-CDTi Executive 4dr saloon, 28,500 miles, £12,999
Best bits – exceptionally good diesel engine, Honda build integrity and reliability, top non-sporting trim means loads of equipment
Worst bits – no hatchback option due to prestige pretensions means saloon buyers stuck with a small boot, visibility not the best, firm ride
Used Honda Accords from £8,000


We found a… 2006 Vauxhall Vectra 1.8 SRi 5dr hatchback, 12,000 miles, £10,000
Best bits – ok, so it’s done a few miles (probably mostly m-way), but the value and equipment levels are high, 1.8 is strong and efficient
Worst bits – no cool contest winner but reasonable running costs makes a good family purchase, buy an older car for even better value
Used Vauxhall Vectras from £8,000
Used Car Guide homepage
Setting your budget
Learn Bangernomics
How to avoid a dud
How to take a test drive
A-Z of buying a used car
How to spot a clocked ca

Ford Mondeo
We found a… 2001 Ford Mondeo 2.0 Zetec, 55,000 miles, £3,999
Best bits – 2.0-litre engine performs well without costing a fortune to run, plenty to choose from, great all-rounder
Worst bits – Zetec not the highest spec but Ford was generous with equipment, “Mondeo Man” rep-mobile image may put off some


We found a… 1996 Nissan Primera 2.0 16v GT 5dr hatchback, 67,000 miles, £1,375
Best bits – top spec includes leather and optional air-con (check this works), GT means great fun to drive, full service history, reliability
Worst bits – sporty model so could be thrashed, also has stiffer ride than standard, bland image
Used Nissan Primeras less than £2,000
Peugeot 406
We found a… 2000 Peugeot 406 2.0 LX 4dr saloon, 63,000 miles, £1,395
Best bits – reasonable spec includes air-con, Pininfarina styling, great ride quality, lots of room inside ((MSN Cars boss Tom Evans runs a diesel one of these and swears by it).
Worst bits – servicing costs relatively expensive, make sure all the electric bits work, this car lacks deal-sealing alloys
Used Peugeot 406s less than £2,000
£2,000 – £4,000
It’s impossible to ignore the Mondeo in this price bracket. In second-generation guise it effortlessly blends quality, driver satisfaction and handsome looks into an appealing, well-equipped package. The biggest problem is they’re so common you might find yourself wanting something else – just to be different. But it remains our pick; five years old with circa 60,000 miles for £4K is achievable. Or the same money buys a top class example of the older shape model.
If it’s speed you crave, you’ll get a Vauxhall Vectra SRi 2.5-litre V6 within this budget – not too sophisticated but quick in a straight line. Volkswagen’s Passat oozes prestige in comparison and is becoming increasingly affordable, while the Honda Accord is the best choice for those looking to make the most reliable purchase.
Used Vauxhall Vectras between £2,000 and £4,000
Cars to avoid
The current Laguna may have been the first five-star EuroNCAP car when it was introduced in 2001, but it has suffered from extensive reliability issues. It is very safe, but don’t blame us if you end up on first-name terms with staff at your local service centre. Citroens in this class are best left to the brave: air-suspension and dodgy electrics a pain – jamming cruise control an eye-catching C5 complaint…

File informationFilename: Honda_Accord01.jpgAlbum name: World's Best Cars CollectionFile Size: 72 KBDate added: Apr 03, 2008Dimensions: 853 x 640 pixelsDisplayed: 41 timesURL: http://www.fundoophotos.com/photogallery/displayimage.php?pos=-804Favorites: Add to Favorites

rakes on these cars consist of large discs both front and back.Suspension on the Ferrari 360 is of the double wishbone type at both the front and rear. Ferrari's setup uses anti-squat and anti-dive geometry for the high speed level handling these super cars are famous for.The convertible Spider versions have an automated hood system which deploys the roof in around 20 seconds.

Vauxhall Vectra
We found a… 1999 Vauxhall Vectra 2.0 CDX 5dr hatchback, 70.000 miles, £1,895
Best bits – CDX the spec to go for, 2.0-litre petrol offers best blend of performance, refinement and economy, roomy inside
Worst bits – ride quality and handling not brilliant, but it’s the Vectra’s boring image that really lets it down

Buyers looking at this end of the market would do well to concentrate on reliability. Especially if you’re purchasing a family car, you really don’t want your new pride and joy to be a regular on your breakdown service’s callout list. For this reason we’d strongly suggest models from Japanese manufacturers. These may not be the last word in style, but are realistically less likely to let you down, significant when many vehicles in this price range will have benefited from some extensive running in… cars with well over 100,000 miles on the clock are common.
The Nissan Primera is a very sound choice. Either generation of car available within the £2k budget lasts well; they have enormous boots and even handle nicely. In terms of availability, however, fleet favourite Ford Mondeos, Vauxhall Vectras, and Peugeot 406s dominate – and if you’re after one you’ll have a good selection to choose from. We’d suggest the Vectra as it offers the best value.


Welcome to the world of the rep-mobile. Don’t let that put you off too much – this size of car makes an excellent family vehicle and offers great value. Large quantities of ex-fleet saloons and hatchbacks flood the market every year, meaning there’s not only plenty to choose from but depreciation is heavy. So you get loads of car for your cash, and won’t have to compromise on condition.
Our round up of the current secondhand market for this segment features all the usual suspects – plus one or two more unusual suggestions. There’s a car here to suit every pocket and every driving preference, while we also point out what you should avoid.

There was a time when the car market was simple. You could buy small cars, medium-sized cars and big cars. Then came MPVs, SUVs and models that were smaller than small, such as the Smart, or bigger than big, like the Maybach.
These days, the choices are so diverse that no manufacturer knows quite where to innovate next. As more and more niches appear, it's getting harder to produce genuinely original ideas. SEAT is the latest maker to try to create a unique opening in the market with the new Toledo. It's unlike its utterly conventional predecessor, and doesn't fall into any cut-and-dried category.
The newcomer looks similar to the Altea MSV (Multi Sports Vehicle), featuring SEAT's fresh family nose and having a similar high-sided appearance. But the Toledo is larger - as long and as wide as a Ford Mondeo.
It's neither a hatchback nor an estate. The rear window wraps round to meet the reverse-raked C-pillar, while the flat bootlid lifts up with the glass to give a truly huge load area. The boot itself measures 500 litres with the rear seats up, while beneath the floor is a separate 91-litre hidden compartment, which is large enough to store three decent-sized shopping bags.
It's similarly spacious inside, with a well laid out cabin and a firm, supportive driving position. We found that the steering column didn't quite provide a comfortable position for us - although it's adjustable for both rake and reach, we were always too close to the wheel, even with it set as far away as possible.
Accommodation in the rear is excellent, with good legroom and ample seating for three adults, while the high roofline gives great headroom all-round.
We drove the 2.0-litre TDI, which will be the flagship Toledo when it goes on sale next year. Its 140bhp VW-sourced engine is crisp and responsive, as well as frugal and refined, and can be mated to a choice of six-speed manual or DSG clutchless manual transmissions.
Performance is impressive, with the 0-60mph sprint completed in a shade under 10 seconds and a 124mph top speed. But it's the in-gear acceleration that really grabs your attention. Hit the throttle on the way out of a corner and power is always instantly available, even from low down in the rev range.
The handling is tidy, if not exciting, with a comfortable ride and good body control. Our main criticism concerns the steering, which feels lifeless and offers little in the way of driver involvement.
So the only question is where the new Toledo falls in the marketplace. It's a tough one to answer, and even SEAT seems unsure. The car tries to combine the virtues of a family hatchback, an estate and an MPV, and goes some way to succeeding. The combination of all three styles has resulted in a few compromises, and there are better hatches, estates and MPVs on the market - yet few cars are as good at multi-tasking.

Honda Accord Euro LuxuryHonda's mid-sizer was launched here in 2003, but while it's no spring chicken the Accord Euro was still good enough to claim the Best Medium Car title in Drive's 2006 Car of the Year awards.A refined and efficient drivetrain, comprising a 140kW 2.4-litre four-cylinder and either six-speed manual or five-speed automatic, is just one area where the Euro still holds its own in the increasingly competitive medium-car category.The ADR81 fuel economy figure for the Euro is 9.4 litres per 100 kilometres, which is respectable for the medium-car category.A four-star Euro NCAP (New Car Assessment Program) crash rating is also favourable,The cabin is another highlight, with presentation and plastics quality that rivals find hard to beat. And there's plenty of space in the cabin for passengers of varying size.

1947-48 Chevy Car - 1947-53 Truck parts, [Details]1947-48 Chevy Car / 1947-53 Truck parts, Porsche set of 4 new carpets and rear turbo light 944/924. DieCast models and Car magazines from 1960-80. See website for pics and info: http://www.angelfire.com/hi5/wheels/http://www.angelfire.com/hi5/wheels/1966 Cosmic Green VW Bug [Details]Welcome to the 1966 cosmic green vw bug restoration and modification page that documents the life of a once blue 1966 vw bug. contains descriptions and photos of the restoration and customization. also includes articles for everyday maintanence.http://greenbug.damiankolbay.comGeraldo's Alfa Home [Details]THE place for Alfa Romeo Sprint Speciales and 2600 Spiders on the web!http://web.utanet.at/berwidge/MercsAndMore.com [Details]The Driver and Nancy's website dedicated to Mercs and other classics! Check out our cars, parts and misc. items for sale! Join our classic and other autos discussion board today!

See it coming, like an arrow. Striking good looks, cutting-edge design, sharply focused tension. See it shoot straight ahead. What is it? Discover the compact sedan breakthrough with strength to open a new era and outlast fleeting trends. Sleek styling and strong performance, with swift, gutsy response to the driver's pedal action. Class-leading* spaciousness and relaxing ride for outstanding comfort. Imagine the pride of driving and owning this distinctive new-generation standard. Get ahead in the new City. People will be watching. *1.3-liter compact sedan classEuipments & Specifications may vary in some cases.

The first electric cars were built around 1832, well before internal combustion powered cars appeared.[21] For a period of time electrics were considered superior due to the silent nature of electric motors compared to the very loud noise of the gasoline engine. This advantage was removed with Hiram Percy Maxim's invention of the muffler in 1897. Thereafter internal combustion powered cars had two critical advantages: 1) long range and 2) high specific energy (far lower weight of petrol fuel versus weight of batteries). The building of battery electric vehicles that could rival internal combustion models had to wait for the introduction of modern semiconductor controls and improved batteries. Because they can deliver a high torque at low revolutions electric cars do not require such a complex drive train and transmission as internal combustion powered cars. Some post-2000 electric car designs such as the Venturi Fétish are able to accelerate from 0-60 mph (96 km/h) in 4.0 seconds with a top speed around 130 mph (210 km/h). Others have a range of 250 miles (400 km) on the United States Environmental Protection Agency‎ (EPA) highway cycle requiring 3-1/2 hours to completely charge.[22] Equivalent fuel efficiency to internal combustion is not well defined but some press reports give it at around 135 miles per US gallon (1.74 L/100 km; 162 mp